Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baker Grace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus (non-admin closure) Celestina007 (talk) 07:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Baker Grace[edit]

Baker Grace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article does not have in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources and also does not satisfy WP:MUSICBIO. Probably a case of WP:TOOSOON. Celestina007 (talk) 11:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep Though it seem like a case of WP:TOOSOON but a quick search on Google shows a couple of third party article features and other criteria that makes me feel she meet [[WP:MUSICBIO]. Bingrick (talk) 12:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Passes general notability guidelines regarding the following sources:

I will also leave these on the talk page of the article. Missvain (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - The article includes reliable third-party sources, as does a search on Google. The subject has received wide coverage that shows notability and thus passes WP:GNG and satisfies WP:BIO. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 06:14, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Seems to meet GNG per the above sources. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 20:17, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per the significant coverage in multiple reliable sources identified above that show a clear pass of WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC criteria 1 (only one criteria needed, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:06, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Notability is established based on the sources already in the article and the additional sources identified, especially by Missvain. Alansohn (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep passes GNG per refsDjflem (talk) 19:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.